I will provide a full, formal, structurally consistent English translation following your previous document style, retaining all paragraphs and professional terminology uniformly for official release.

On the afternoon of April 10, 2026, the First General Meeting and Training Exchange Seminar of the National Enforcement Center of Jintang Law Firm was successfully held in the lobby on the basement floor of Jintang Law Firm. The event marks a crucial step for Jintang Law Firm in resolving the long-standing difficulty of judgment enforcement and realizing clients’ winning rights, officially launching the integrated development and capacity upgrading of the firm’s professional enforcement teams nationwide.

Distinguished expert lawyers from the Enforcement Law Professional Committee of the Shenzhen Lawyers Association were invited to provide on-site guidance. Practitioners from all branches of Jintang Law Firm attended the event, forming a vibrant and immersive exchange atmosphere.

The meeting was opened by Lawyer Zhu Haihua from Jintang Bao’an Law Firm, who extended a warm welcome to all guests and participants. The First General Meeting of the National Enforcement Center commenced thereafter. Lawyer Meng Jun, Director of Jintang Bao’an Law Firm and Director of Jintang National Enforcement Center, delivered a detailed introduction to the center’s functional positioning, organizational structure, work objectives and 2026 annual work plan.

The National Enforcement Center is positioned as a comprehensive platform integrating professional services, resource sharing and capacity building, committed to providing clients with full-process, cross-jurisdictional legal services for judgment enforcement.

The center adopts a three-tier organizational system comprising a headquarters center, branch centers and professional working groups. The professional teams include the Enforcement Investigation Group, Enforcement Measure Group, and Enforcement Derivative Litigation Group, respectively responsible for property clue investigation and verification, enforcement measures such as sealing, freezing and auction, and derivative litigation including enforcement objections, addition and modification of persons subject to enforcement, and subrogation litigation.

The center has clarified six core responsibilities: organizational development, talent cultivation, professional output, difficult case resolution, case source expansion, and capability assessment, striving to build a nationally unified and integrated enforcement service platform.

In the subsequent training seminar, Lawyer Meng delivered a special sharing titled Procedural Gameplay in Adding Shareholders as Persons Subject to Enforcement — Path Selection and Practical Essentials: Enforcement Objection Procedure vs. Separate Litigation.

With rich practical experience in compulsory enforcement and non-performing asset disposal, Lawyer Meng analyzed the legal basis, operational procedures and strategic considerations for adding shareholders as enforcement subjects through typical cases handled by his team.

He sorted out core regulatory provisions including the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Modification and Addition of Parties in Civil Enforcement Procedures, the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China, relevant judicial interpretations, and the Provisions on Civil Case Causes of Action. He emphatically compared the applicable scenarios, time cycles, costs and practical effects between enforcement objection procedures and separate civil litigation.

Lawyer Meng pointed out that cases involving insufficient capital contribution, corporate asset mixing, and tort liability are more suitable for resolution via enforcement objection procedures, while cases requiring substantive judicial review or diversified claims are better resolved through separate litigation.

Combined with Article 54 of the newly revised Company Law concerning the accelerated maturity of shareholders’ capital contribution obligations and the latest updates of the Draft Judicial Interpretation of the Company Law, he analyzed current judicial disputes and adjudication trends regarding whether shareholders with unexpired contribution terms can be added as persons subject to enforcement. The lecture featured solid theoretical support and abundant real cases, providing powerful practical guidance for frontline enforcement practice.

In the interactive Q&A session, expert lawyers from the Shenzhen Lawyers Association Enforcement Committee shared in-depth insights on hot and difficult issues, including path selection between enforcement objections and separate litigation, as well as the judicial application of accelerated shareholder capital contribution maturity. Jintang practitioners actively exchanged work difficulties and practical experience, creating intensive academic discussion and opinion collision that deepened everyone’s understanding of sophisticated enforcement practice.

The event concluded successfully amid warm applause.

The establishment of Jintang’s National Enforcement Center represents a major strategic initiative of the firm to tackle enforcement difficulties and elevate professional service capabilities. Moving forward, adhering to the principles of professionalism, collaboration and pragmatism, the center will continuously integrate internal and external resources, coordinate all regional branches, strengthen professional training and difficult case handling in compulsory enforcement, and provide solid guarantees for clients to convert favorable judgments into real enforceable rights and interests.